Custom CSS
double-click to edit, do not edit in source
5/20/2026 |
3:30 PM – 4:45 PM |
Mt. Sopris A - Grand Hyatt Denver, Lobby Level
CI44: Informatics Debates
Presentation Type: Informatics Debate
Must a Nurse Be Human? A Debate on Agentic AI and the Future of Nursing Practice
Presentation Type: Informatics Debate
Click to View Presentation
Not recorded for AMIA Now
2026 Amplify 25x5 Presentation
Presentation Time: 03:30 PM - 03:55 PM
Abstract Keywords: Generative AI in Clinical Workflow: Ambient Listening, Chart Summarization, Automated Response with LLM, Ethics, Health Policy, Reimbursement and Affordability, and Sustainability, Human Factors and Usability, Analytical Artificial Intelligence: ML, Digital Pathology, Imaging AI, Predictive Analytics, Governance
Working Group: Nursing Informatics Working Group
Primary Track: Implementing Real-World Change, Digital Engagement, and Connected Health
Rapid advances in agentic artificial intelligence (AI) (defined as systems capable of autonomous planning,
decision-making, and action execution) have accelerated discussions surrounding the relationship between human
roles (e.g., nurses) and non-human intelligences in patient care. While “nurse” is a regulated designation, the use of the world has become commonplace among AI products which seek to augment traditional clinical care pathways
through inference, alerts, or care recommendations. This informatics debate will explore whether, in a healthcare
system enhanced by agentic AI, “nurse” must be human. Two participants will argue in favor of the resolution,
highlighting concepts of moral agency, accountability, compassion, and human-centered, relational care embedded
in the professional identity of nursing. Two participants will argue against, citing emerging use cases demonstrating
AI’s capacity for triage, patient monitoring, documentation, clinical task automation, and relational communication.
The moderator will engage the audience through polling and structured discussion. Attendees will learn to critically
evaluate ethical, regulatory, and operational implications of delegating nursing functions to non-human agents and
consider practical frameworks for determining which tasks should remain human-only.
Moderator:
Carolyn Sun, PhDHunter College
Speaker(s):
Carolyn Sun, PhD, RN, ANP, FAAN, FAMIAHunter College
Christina Baker, PhD,RN, NCSN, NI-BCUniversity of Colorado, Anschutz, College of Nursing
Ann Wieben, PhD, RN NI-BC FAMIAUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing
Benjamin Galatzan, PhD, RNUniversity of Alabama
Paula Wolski, MSN, RN, NI-BC, FAMIABrigham and Women's/Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital
Author(s):
Carolyn Sun, PhD -
Hunter College;
Benjamin Galatzan, PhD -
University of Alabama;
Christina Baker, PhD,RN, NCSN, NI-BC -
University of Colorado, Anschutz, College of Nursing;
Ann Wieben, PhD, RN NI-BC FAMIA -
University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing;
Carolyn Sun,
PhD - Hunter College
Carolyn
Sun,
PhD, RN, ANP, FAAN, FAMIA - Hunter College
Christina
Baker,
PhD,RN, NCSN, NI-BC - University of Colorado, Anschutz, College of Nursing
Ann
Wieben,
PhD, RN NI-BC FAMIA - University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing
Benjamin
Galatzan,
PhD, RN - University of Alabama
Paula
Wolski,
MSN, RN, NI-BC, FAMIA - Brigham and Women's/Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital
Resolved: AI Scribe–Enabled Order Entry Is Good for Patients, Clinicians, and the Field of Clinical Decision Support
Presentation Type: Informatics Debate
Click to View Presentation
Not recorded for AMIA Now
2026 Amplify 25x5 Presentation
Presentation Time: 03:55 PM - 04:20 PM
Abstract Keywords: Generative AI in Clinical Workflow: Ambient Listening, Chart Summarization, Automated Response with LLM, Clinical Decision Support and Care Pathways, Human Factors and Usability
Primary Track: Advancing Wellness for Providers and Community with Consideration of Human Factors
While artificial intelligence (AI) scribes reduce documentation burden and improve clinician experience through clinical note generation, more recently multiple AI scribe vendors have announced or are actively piloting queuing up orders as a human scribe might do. The extension of these tools into order suggestions introduces new patient-safety risks as well as unprecedented opportunities for next-generation clinical decision support (CDS). This Informatics Debate will argue the resolution: “AI scribe–enabled order entry (AIOE) is good for patients, clinicians, and the field of CDS.” Proponents will contend that AIOE can improve safety, standardize care, detect omissions, and leverage conversational context unavailable to the electronic health record (EHR). Opponents will argue that AIOE creates novel automation-driven hazards, circumvents existing CDS, and alters responsibility and cognition in ways that risk patient harm. Attendees will gain a nuanced understanding of the benefits, risks, and EHR design implications of AIOE.
Moderator:
Evan Orenstein, MDChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta
Speaker(s):
Julia Yarahuan, MD, MBIChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta/Emory University
Allison McCoy, PhD, ACHIP, FACMI, FAMIAVanderbilt University Medical Center
Adam Wright, PhDVanderbilt University Medical Center
Author(s):
Evan Orenstein, MD -
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta;
Evan Orenstein,
MD - Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
Julia
Yarahuan,
MD, MBI - Children's Healthcare of Atlanta/Emory University
Allison
McCoy,
PhD, ACHIP, FACMI, FAMIA - Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Adam
Wright,
PhD - Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Debate: Ambient AI Scribes Are Good for the Practice of Medicine and Medical Education
Presentation Type: Informatics Debate
Click to View Presentation
Not recorded for AMIA Now
2026 Amplify 25x5 Presentation
Presentation Time: 04:20 PM - 04:45 PM
Abstract Keywords: Generative AI in Clinical Workflow: Ambient Listening, Chart Summarization, Automated Response with LLM, Ethics, Workforce Automation, Communication, and Workflow Efficiency, Clinician Well-Being
Primary Track: Advancing Wellness for Providers and Community with Consideration of Human Factors
Ambient “AI scribes” promise to rescue clinicians from documentation overload by listening to encounters and drafting notes. They may also deskill clinicians, hard-code new biases into the chart, and train a generation of residents to edit machine output instead of constructing their own clinical narratives. Ambient AI scribes are good for the practice of medicine and medical education.
One team will argue in favor of ambient scribes as a tool to reduce burnout, improve documentation, support real-time decision making, and enhance learning. The second team will oppose, highlighting safety, equity, medico-legal risks, “never-skilling” learners, eroding narrative competence, and weakening the doctor-patient relationship. Teams will cite current literature and personal experience.
Moderator:
Erik Holbrook, MDMass General Brigham
Speaker(s):
Jeffrey Nielson, MD, MSKettering Health
Ellen Kim, MDHarvard Medical School
Colton Hood, PhysicianGW Medical Faculty Associates
Margaret Soulen, MDDayton Children's Hospital (Dayton, OH)
Author(s):
Jeffrey Nielson, MD, MS -
Kettering Health;
Colton Hood, Physician -
GW Medical Faculty Associates;
Nicholas Genes, MD, PhD -
NYU Grossman School of Medicine;
Margaret Soulen, MD -
Dayton Children's Hospital (Dayton, OH);
Ellen Kim, MD -
Harvard Medical School;
Erik Holbrook,
MD - Mass General Brigham
Jeffrey
Nielson,
MD, MS - Kettering Health
Ellen
Kim,
MD - Harvard Medical School
Colton
Hood,
Physician - GW Medical Faculty Associates
Margaret
Soulen,
MD - Dayton Children's Hospital (Dayton, OH)